Some politicians are also people of action. Dynamic figures who, when the going gets tough, are prepared to step out of their office, roll their sleeves up and get their hands dirty.
Like the Mayor of Blue Mountains City Council, Councillor Mark Greenhill, the area at the heart of the terrible firestorms sweeping through New South Wales, Australia. As well as contributing to the co-ordination of efforts to manage the disaster, Cllr Greenhill “did sneak away yesterday” from mayoral duties to do a 12 hour shift as a volunteer fire officer, standing literally in the line of fire with colleagues and friends, to do his bit. “My small contribution pales into insignificance compared to the majority of firefighters… they are just magnificent, they are our thin yellow line and they personify what our community is all about“.
Then there’s my favourite Cory Booker, current Mayor of Newark and now Senator-elect of New Jersey. His activities during heavy snow in his city a couple of years back are legendary; he was out there with crews, digging cars out, delivering emergency supplies to people snowed in and keeping in touch with people throughout by Twitter. If you want to understand what makes him tick, read this excellent article on the New Yorker.
But neither would appear to have anything on Councillor Cara Hilton, standing as Labour’s candidate in the Dunfermline by-election. For Councillor Hilton has a spectacular offer for the good citizens of Dunfermline and the West Fife villages. She is offering to “reduce your cost of living“, which is a quite remarkable claim for a putative backbench opposition MSP to make.
I visualise her as the parliamentary equivalent of Mrs Moneypenny, spending her days scouring the streets of her constituency, accosting her constituents, doling out money saving tips: “don’t buy pre-packaged salad”; “eating out costs a fortune”; “check your tyre pressure and use less fuel”; “do you really need to throw that out, you can make a tasty casserole from left-overs you know”.
Actually, it’s not a bad platform. If it were me, I’d be setting up community sharing arrangements for energy supplies, seeking funding for community food initiatives and helping get them set up in the most deprived communities, exhorting energy suppliers to stop pre-paid metering for their poorest customers, calling on the council to raise the clothing grant voucher amount and extending the availability of free school meals, while lifting charges for community care services like lunch-clubs and taking on the supermarkets and big business, demanding a living wage at the very least for all they employ.
But I doubt very much that Scottish Labour has a clue how Cllr Hilton will go about delivering such a sweeping pledge. Particularly when the things that she could do are largely all things she can do at the moment as an elected member on Fife Council.
No, it’s just an empty slogan in a by-election which has Labour at its absolute worst: so desperate is it for the prize of another seat at Holyrood (and an SNP scalp) that it is prepared to say anything to get their woman elected.
There are two Labour leaflets allegedly doing the rounds in Dunfermline at the moment. The first turns the SNP’s cost of living savings leaflet on its head and claims Labour glory for all manner of policies that it has only a tenuous link to.
Absolutely true is that the Labour-led administration introduced free bus travel for older and disabled people, and a very fine policy it is too. Also true is the fact that Labour introduced free personal care, again a good policy which has helped many older people’s income go further.
But it is stretching the truth to say that Labour was first to scrap bridge tolls. It was the Liberal Democrat arm of its coalition which insisted on the scrapping of Skye Bridge tolls being in the partnership agreement: it wasn’t a Labour manifesto pledge. And indeed, despite having the powers throughout its eight years in office to scrap tolls on the Forth Road bridge, Labour had no inclination to do so. These are the ones that count for the people of Dunfermline.
And while Labour did indeed support the scrapping of prescription charges when the SNP proposed to do so, what that wee segment fails to mention is that again, it had the power to do so when in administration and did not. Indeed, under Labour prescription charges rose and rose regularly. That support came about because the party felt it could not be seen to oppose their scrapping rather than from any principled position on making them free.
Perhaps the most misleading claim is that “Labour froze council tax first”. This is technically correct with the Labour administration in Glasgow City Council putting in place a voluntary freeze before the SNP became the Scottish Government in 2007. But not in Fife. The leaflet goes on to say that “we continue to support a freeze” which will discomfit many in the movement and especially in council administrations elsewhere. All the noises off in recent months have suggested that Labour is moving away from its 2011 election stance on the grounds that it is unfair to the poorest and unsustainable in fiscal terms.
Alongside this leaflet is another: “independence at any cost”, which sets out that independence would cost Fife Council £100 million and would result in thousands of public sector job losses. “The price you pay with the SNP” apparently. Project Fear at its doom laden best, based on no semblance of fact whatsoever.
The vortex effect of a by-election means that normal rules of engagement tend to be abandoned, particularly if one party gets a whiff of victory in the air in the finishing straight. Some have interpreted Labour’s messaging this weekend as a sign of desperation but it’s a bit more complex than that. They clearly think they are in with a shout of winning, they just have to seal the deal in these last few days. Hence, the desperation is to push those wobbling, still to be persuaded electors into voting for them by ramping up the offer. Who cares if anything that is being said is true or do-able, so long as it gains the necessary votes.
These tactics also smack of something more deep-seated. Winning this by-election is everything, indeed, getting back to winning ways is everything and the party would appear to be prepared to stoop to anything to make it so. It might well work and such a victory would provide the filip the party needs both in Scottish and UK electoral terms, but only in the short term.
Alarmingly, its approach to this by-election would suggest that Labour has learned nothing from its two Scottish election defeats. The Scottish people in previously Labour heartlands and strongholds turned away from Labour because it no longer had an offer worth voting for. Power for power’s sake had become the thing and folk could see through that, particularly when they had a competent, credible alternative for their votes.
Recent polls on voting intentions in 2016 and on approval ratings for parties and leaders suggest that Labour has done and is doing nothing to turn these perceptions around:fighting by-elections like Dunfermline using a succession of low-blows reinforces this. Moreover, it’s not entirely clear either that Dunfermline voters – rather used to confounding conventional electoral wisdom these days – will fall for these tactics.
Even if they do return a Labour MSP, a single by-election victory does not a recovery make and if won on the basis of lies, smears and half-truths will actually represent a retrograde step. Labour needs to start being honest with itself if it wants to win the trust of the electorate.
Worst of all, Cara Hilton is a decent and strong candidate who is worth better than this. There was lots to like in her profile and I hoped in her to see a glimmer of Labour’s future, not its past.
But allowing the party to occlude her offering with this kind of machine politics suggests she’s not nearly as substantive a politician as I thought she might be. Voters in Dunfermline and the West Fife villages might want to ponder this when they go to the polls on Thursday. One thing’s for sure, they wouldn’t be getting a Cory Booker or a Mark Greenhill.
Before the Scotsman think I simply stole their headline, let me explain.
Twenty years ago, a whisky marketer hit upon a wheeze of bottling malt whiskies and labelling and promoting them for special occasions. One such was “a dram of destiny” – I bought three. One was for my dad, one for me and one for my granda: the intention was that we whisky buffs would all have something special to look forward to when Scotland eventually became independent.
And just as Nicola Sturgeon tweeted that when she became an SNP member at the tender age of sixteen, she never dreamed she’d be signing a referendum bill, so I have waited a very long time to dig my dram of destiny out from the recesses of the cupboard and put it out where I can see it. To remind me of how far we have come, how long we have waited and how, now that Scotland’s date with destiny is so close, we can almost taste it.
So, Scotland’s historic vote will be held on Thursday 18 September 2014. A surprise to many, it’s earlier than we all thought and suspected. Many were fretting that thanks to all the summer sporting shenanigans, it would be pushed back beyond the autumn school holidays and held as the days get shorter and gloomier.
Late September is a very good call and avoids the dog days of autumn. And if Scotland votes yes, it’s handily placed just before the September weekend, allowing for a long weekend of celebrations – unless you are in Edinburgh which for some inexplicable reason, has the previous Monday off. Still, there’s a day for getting the capital gee-ed up for a yes vote.
The Scottish Government has gone for a traditional polling day but I had hoped they might pull a further surprise on us by opting for a Saturday vote. It’s what they do in lots of European countries and seems to work fine for turnout. But perhaps, this wasn’t the vote to experiment with beyond extending the franchise. Confusing voters by changing the traditional polling day could have reduced the numbers who turn out and that would be the worst possible outcome. Perhaps more prosaically, politicians like what they know and the parties have always tended to the traditional when it has come to fiddling with the franchise. And in any event, such a shift would probably have required Westminster approval, given that it still controls the rules and law on people voting. So a Thursday it is.
And before we get there, there’s a lot of work still to be done to persuade more people to vote yes. But I have no doubt that they will do.
Those who write off the independence cause this far out, with eighteen months to go, based on the polls’ showing in recent months, appear to have learned nothing from recent elections. In 2010, everyone was predicting that Labour would sweep back to power: indeed, the polls suggested this right up until early Spring. Yet, the SNP was confident from its private polling that it was building momentum and turning don’t knows their way and also starting to persuade other parties’ supporters to their cause. Its slow-burn campaign worked: we all know the result of that one.
It’s quite clear from the work going on just now that there is a campaign plan in place. The nay-sayers can jump up and down all they like demanding that the vote be held earlier, that the white paper on independence be published now, but the Scottish Government is working to a plan and increasingly, in campaigning terms, it is clear that no detail has been left to chance. This is the Yes camp’s campaign to lead and to boss and that in itself, gives a positive vibe to things. They are leading at a pace they want to and that is a good sign.
The aim, of course, is to build momentum, slowly but surely, until a tipping point is reached – as it was in 2011 – and the votes come tumbling over. The SNP has done it not once, but twice before and knows what is required. Anyone failing to take the 5/2 odds currently on offer for a yes vote, would be a fool to pass them up.
My date with my dram of destiny has a few months to wait yet, but I have no doubt it will come. Sadly, my granda’s no longer here to share it, but dad and I will be making sure to raise and share a toast with him. And to Scotland choosing a better future. And in honour of all those who walked this long journey, who made it possible but didn’t quite make it.